BARLOW  of  BARLOW

Summer Issue - August 1994

A. Maxim Coppage, Founder                           Edson L. Barlow, Editor

            840 East Gunn Road, Rochester, Michigan 48306-1905

Published quarterly in February, May, August and November.   Queries are free and are welcome from all.
Annual index included with the November issue.     Subscriptions are $10 annually.
Please send all editorial material, queries and subscription requests to:
Edson L. Barlow, 840 East Gunn Road, Rochester, Michigan 48306-1905
.....page 137.......

John Barlow (ca. 1600 - 1674) of Fairfield, Connecticut
by Edson L. Barlow

John Barlow, the immigrant ancestor of one Barlow line in America, came to New Eng- land  with his  family early  in the  17th century and settled  at what is now  the  town of  Fairfield in Fairfield County, Connecticut.

All  that  is  known  about him  from  the  available records is that he sold  some  land,  his children married and his will was run  through probate. Much about him remains a  mystery,  although there  are clues  that can be used to partially reconstruct his life.

Ancestry and Nativity

John Barlow  was  probably  born around  1600.  This guess is based  pretty  much on  the assumption  that he was about  twenty  years old when his  first child was born in 1620- 25.   A  birth  year of 1600 would make him about 74 years old when he died.

John  Barlow's  birthplace is  another matter.   John  was  apparently a descendant of Roger Barlow  (ca. 1500 - 1553),  according  to  the English  College of  Heralds.  Roger Barlow  was the  first  of  the  family to  settle  in  Pembrokeshire,  Wales,  and  he pur- chased  an estate, Slebetch  Manor,  there  from  the  crown  in 1546.  Joel  Barlow,  a  descendant  of   John Barlow, applied for and  was  given  the  privilege of  the  Barlow of   Slebetch  arms  by  the  English  College  of  Heralds  when  he  was in  England  in  the  late 18th  century.  (The Barlow  of  Slebetch arms are  shown above on  the  right in  the masthead  of  this  newsletter;  the Barlow of  Lancaster arms  are  on  the left.)  Based seemingly upon this, a  num- ber  of  references  have  stated  that  John Barlow  was born in  Pembrokeshire, Wales.  While  there seems  to  be  little  doubt  that  John  was  a  descendant of  the Barlows  of  Slebetch   (it  would be  nice  to  see  the  College  of  Heralds' research to  onfirm  their  findings),  it  is  much more  likely  that  he was "of England"  when  he sailed  for  New England  in  the 1630's.   Whether  he was born in Wales  or England remains a mystery.

John Barlow's parents are not known  from  the records.  In 1987 I received  from Mr. Hal Young copies of  correspondence  that  he  had  received  that  indicate  that  John

......page 138.....

Barlow's   parents  were  Alexander  Barlow and Mary Brereton of  Manchester, Lanca- shire, England.  A  Mormon Archive Record  group  sheet  prepared  by Estelle  Tidwell Rowley  in, I  think,  the 1930s  (the Temple  Ordinance  Data's  earliest  date  is 1931)  shows  a  Sir  Alexander  Barlow and  Mary  Brereton  having  14 children   from  1581 to  about  1602  at  Manchester.   Their  twelfth child was  a  John Barlow  born  about 1598 and  he  was given as marrying  Ann Ward.

Her source references were given as: 
"Lanc. Vol 2 p 396 Lanc Pub B. V. 75 pp 45, 46; Lanc. Pub B. V. 84 p 28 
(funeral certificate of A. Barlow);
Lanc Pub B. V. 31 (O.S.) pp 209-212; B13F1 
(Family Papers by Sir Montague Barlow); 
Lanc. 38 V 2 pp 237, 248
(Birth and Chr records)." 

Whether this is our John Barlow is open to question.

Colonial naming  customs would seem to  indicate that  these  were not  John Barlow's parents.   The fact  that John's first-born son was named John is normal, and he  had no  other son to  name Alexander.  But  if  his   mother  was  Mary  Brereton, I  would expect a  daughter to  be  named  Mary.  Instead, he  had  Elizabeth, Martha, Deborah,  Isabella and Ruth, and I would  expect his mother and  his  wife's mother to  have one of  these names.

Another problem with Alexander Barlow is  his ancestry which does not include Roger Barlow of Slebetch and would belie Joel Barlow's claim to the Barlow of  Slebetch arms. 

Alexander's ancestry is  traced  back  to Albini  de  Sale  by Sir Montague Barlow in  his
Barlow  Family Records  as follows:

Sir Alexander Barlow -A- (1558-1620) married Mary Brereton
Alexander Barlow  -B- (c1515-1584) married Elizabeth Leigh
Ellis Barlow -C- married Ann Reddish
Roger Barlow  -D- ( -c1525) married Catherine Prestwick
Alexander Barlow  -E- married Elizabeth Ashton in 1434
Nicholas Barlow -F- married Anne ----
John Barlow -G- married Joan de Holland,
John de Barlow -H- married Margery ---
Roger de Barlow  -I-
Robert de Barlow  -J-
Sir Thomas de Barlow -K- (c1250-1300) married Margery Ainsworth(?)
Sir Robert/Roger de Barlow -L- (c1230- )
Thomas de Barlow -M- (c1200- )
Alexander -N- - son of Albini de Sale (c1200- )
Albini de Sale -O- (c1150-)

On  the  other hand,  Alexander and Mary  were prominent people.  Sir Alexander was a Knight and  his  wife  Mary Brereton  was  apparently a descendent of  King  Edward  I.   Perhaps  even their  twelfth  child was important enough to  warrent  a  prominent home- lot at  Fairfield.  Or perhaps Roger Ludlow, who was  the second son of  Thomas Ludlow 
of Denton, Wiltshire, was closely related to one of the Barlows.

Immigration and Settlement

In  her   "A  Memorial  of  the  Kindred  and  Ancestry  of  Harriet  L.  Sturges Goulden  of  Fairfield, Connecticut", Harriet E. Goulden  Whitmore  wrote  in  1899   that, "John  Barlow,   Puritan,  entitled  to  his  coat  of   arms, registered  as  passenger  on  board  the Mathew,  from  London,   May 21, 1635.    The  ship  sailed  under  warrent  from  'ye  Earl  of  Carlisle;  Richard Goodlade, master.'"  While the time seems right,  no  doc- umentation 
of  this ship or its passenger complement has been found.

John  Barlow  was  one  of   the  earliest  settlers  at  Fairfield   [D.  Hamilton Hurd, History of Fairfield County].    The  first  group that  came  in  with  Roger  Ludlow,  after  he  had received permission  to settle  Fairfield in September 1639 from  the  General  Court at  Hartford,  included  John  Green, Thomas  Staples,  Thomas Newton,  Edward  Jessop and Edmund Strickland.

Others,  mostly  from  Watertown,  Massachusetts,  according   to  Farnham's Fairfield,  The Biography of a Community, followed 

.. ...page 139.....

shortly, and  apparently included  John Barlow and his family. Fairfield originally con- sisted of   but  eight  or  ten families,  living  along  five roads that  Ludlow  established. These  roads created four squares, each comprising twenty-five or thirty acres.

John  Barlow's  homelot  was  situated  with  those of  Roger  Ludlow,  Thomas Staples, Thomas  Newton  and Robert Hawkins  in  the  so-called  Ludlow  Square, as shown on the above  map  [Elizabeth H. Schenck, History of Fairfield]

In today's Fairfield, Frost Avenue is now the Post Road, Ludlow  Avenue is now the Old Post Road, and the Fairfield  Historical Society sits approximately on John Barlow's lot.

Roger  Ludlow  was  born  at Dinton, Wiltshire, England,  in 1590  and  was a son of  a  Wes t Country gentry family that  had  become  prominent  during  the  reign of  Henry VIII.   He attended  Balliol College, Oxford, and later studied  law  at the Inner Temple.  A  Puritan  and  an officer of  the Massachusetts Bay  Company, he  sailed to New Eng- land in March 1630  on  the  Mary  and  John out of  Plymouth, England.  He was one of   the  founders  of  Dorchester,  Massachusetts,  was Deput  Governor of  the Massa- chusetts  colony  in 1634,  was  the   principal  draftsman of  the Fundamental Orders, the  basis  of  government  in Connecticut until  the  Charter  of  1662, and in 1651-53  was commissioner of  the United Colonies of New England.

So ... who  was  this  John  Barlow  who  was  given a  lot  next door to Roger  Ludlow? John Barlow  held  no  public  office  and yet  he  seems to have  been given a  place  in the original settlement  that says he was an  important person.  Perhaps he or his wife were  closely  related  to  Roger Ludlow,  or perhaps  he  and  Roger Ludlow were close friends in England.   It is, to me at least, a curious matter. 

........page 140......
John Barlow sold his original home-lot to Thomas Morehouse  before 1653  and moved  to unsettled  land  north  of  the village center.   This  was  afterwards  called  "Barlow's  Plain."

Death

John Barlow  died  around  the  first of  June 1674,  probably  at his home  at Fairfield.
His will reads as follows:
 

"Imprimus:   I  Comit my soul  into ye  hands of my  faythfull Creator upon his pleasing shall be to  require  it and  my body to a  Comely buriall.   And for  my  wordly  goods  my  funeral  expenses  first  defrayed  and my debts discharged  I dispose as follows:

"I  give  and bequeath to  my loving  wife Anne Barlowe  all my Lands hous- ing Cattles of all sorts and all my moveable estate.

"I  give and bequeathe the  premises and every  part of them to my  Loving sonn  John Barlow  and  to  my  daughters   Elizabeth  frost  Martha Beers Deborah  Sturgis   Issable Clapham and  Ruth Bradlee to be equally divided among them. 

And whereas
Inconveniences  may  follow  by dividing   some  parcell  of  land  or  parti- culars Chattles or moveables my will is that whichsoever of  the  six  above  named Legatees  will  give the greatest  price  for  the  same  shall  have  it.  In  witness thereof  I have hear unto set my hand this eight day of  March one thousand six hundred seventy foure."

Witnesses                                                    John Barlowe
James Beers Junior                                                    Seal
Robert Romsie

The inventory of  his estate was taken on June 9, 1674, by George  Squire Sr., Richard Ogden and John Burr, and the  will was  proved  on November 03, 1674,  at  Fairfield. An  agreement between his son and two of his sons-in-law was entered into on Novem- ber 20, 1674  [Fairfield Probate District Records Vol. 1665-75 and Barlow of Barlow page 66]

Ann  Barlow died probably early  in 1685/6  and  probably at Fairfield.   The  inventory of  her  estate  was  taken on  February  25, 1685,  and  was  iled  on  March 10, 1685. [Fairfield Probate]
No gravestone has been found for either John or  Ann Barlow.

Kinsmen

Thomas  Barlow  was a  contemporary of John Barlow. He may have been a brother, a nephew or a cousin,  a speculation based solely on  the  surname - no relationship can be  gleaned from  the  records.   Thomas Barlow  was  born probably around 1620 and  probably in England.  He came to New England about the  same  time as  John Barlow,  probably  landing  initially in Massachusetts.

His  appearance  at  Windsor, Connecticut,  where  he  was  sued  in 1649  by Richard Samwis of  that  town, would indicate that he  landed  at Boston and  followed Thomas  Hooker's overland  route into  Connecticut.  He subsequently settled at Fairfield where he  may  have owned  land as early as 1650.
[Donald L. Jacobus, History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield]

Thomas Barlow  married Rose Sherwood,  a  daughter  of  Thomas and Alice Sherwood and  the  widow of  Thomas  Rumbell, around 1650 at Fairfield.  On December 3, 1653, Fairfield  granted  Thomas  Barlow  six acres  on the northwest corner of Frost Square
(see map on page 139)
Thomas  Barlow  died  in  the  fall of  1658 and his will,  which was dated September 8, 1658, and proved on October 20, 1658, .........

......page141.....
named his wife and their children Phebe, Deborah and Mary.  Rose (Sherwood) (Rum- bell)   Barlow  subsequently  married  Edward  Nash of  Norwalk, Connecticut, around 1673.

It is also an old  family tradition or legend that James Barlow  of  Suffield, Connecticut, was John Barlow's brother. It is not known where this story originated but it has been repeated in Cuyler Reynolds' Genealogical & Family History of Southern New York and in an article by Cholly  Knickerbocker in  the old  New York Journal American.  In his book   The  Isreal Barlow Story  and  Mormon Mores,  Ora H. Barlow  offers significant 
proof  that James Barlow, who was  born in 1659 or  some 59 years  after John, was a  son  of  the  immigrant Edmund Barlow of  Malden, Massachusetts, and a grandson of  James Barlow of Turton, Lancashire, England.

Family

With one  possible  exception,  John Barlow's  family is given in his will.  It  is  believed that it  was customary  in colonial wills  to list children  first by  sex and then by birth order.  That  is, sons  were listed  first in  their  birth order and then the  daughters in their birth order.

The "possible exception" to John Barlow's family is Ann  Barlow.  According to Jacobus in his  History  and  Genealogy of  the Families of  Old Fairfield,  she was "called"  John Barlow's  daughter in the Colonial Records.   She  was not, however, listed in either his or his wife's will.  She was still living at the time of John and Ann Barlow's deaths, and while  she  had  moved  to  New  York, she  was  not  that  far away.   If  she  had been "disinherited"  or  "disowned"  for  some  reason,  she  probably  would have  been men- tioned in  the will, if  only to  exclude her.   The suspicion occurs that she was either a younger  sister or  a  niece  of  John Barlow.  In  any  event, until better information is obtained, she continues to be listed as the oldest daughter.

Thus John and Ann Barlow's children were:

Ann Barlow was born probably around 1625-30 and probably in England. She married Samuel Drake on September 13, 1650,  at Fairfield [Fairfield Vital Records]  This  marriage  was  also  recorded  as  September 30, 1650,  by  the  Rev.  Silas Constant of  the  York- town, New York, Presbyterian Church.  They moved to Eastchester New York, in 1663  and Samuel Drake  died there  in 1686. He  was a  son of John and Elizabeth  (Rogers) Drake who came  from England  in 1630  [Barlow of Barlow, page 66]  Ann  died  after  Dec- ember  12, 1691   [The American Genealogist, 1987],  probably  at  East- chester.

Their children were:  John Drake, born in 1654; Joseph Drake, born in 1663 and died on  May 12, 1732; Rebecca Drake;  Ruth Drake;  Samuel Drake, died  in 1690; Hannah Drake and  Mary Drake.

Elizabeth  Barlow  was born probably  around 1620-25 and  probably in England.  She married  Daniel  Frost  around  1640-42  at Fairfield and was  his second wife. He was born  around  1613  in  England,  was  baptized  on  January 17, 1612/3, at St. Mary's, Nottingham, and was a son of William Frost who came to  New  England  from Notting- ham.  She died in 1686.

Their children were:
Sarah Frost,  born around 1644;  Rachel Frost born around 1647 at Fairfield and later married Robert Rumsey; Hannah Frost, born  around 1648; Daniel Frost, born around 1650;  Joseph  Frost,  born  around 1652; Isaac Frost,  born around 1654; and Esther Frost born around 1656 [Donald L. Jacobus, op. cit.]

.....page 142.....
Martha Barlow was born probably around 1625 and probably in England. She married James Beers around 1659 at Fairfield, when he bought land there.  He came  to Water- town, Massachusetts, as a youth with his uncle in 1635, and was a son of James Beers of Gravesend, Kent, England.   He died in 1694  and she died in 1698, both at Fairfield.

Their children were:
James  Beers, born in 1662  and died in 1691;  Martha  Beers;  Deborah Beers;  Joseph Beers, died in 1696; and Elizabeth Beers.

Deborah  Barlow  was  born  probably  around  1630  and  probably  in  England.   She married  John  Sturgis  in 1650 at  Fairfield.   He was  born  around 1624, probably in England.  He died in 1700, probably at Fairfield. 

Their  children  were:   Jonathan  Sturgis,  born  around  1651;  Joseph  Sturgis, born around  1654;  Sarah Sturgis,  born  around  1661-63;  Deborah  Sturgis, born around 1659-62;  John Sturgis, born around  1655-60;  Abigail Sturgis, born around 1663-73; and Thomas Sturgis born around 1657-68.

Isabella Barlow was born probably around 1632 and probably in England. She married Peter  Clapham around 1660  at  Fairfield.  He  was  born  around 1628 and he died on February  18,  1698.    Their   only  child  was  Abigail Clapham  who  married  Thomas Merwin in March 1678/9 at Fairfield.

John  Barlow  was  born  probably  around  1635  and possibly  in  either  England or Massachusetts.  He had a home-lot on Main Street at Stratford, Fairfield County, Conn-  ecticut, in 1660, at  which time he  was  probably at  least 21 years old.   He  sold  this lot  to  John  Hurd  and  moved  back  to  Fairfield  before  1668.   He  married  Abigail  Lockwood  probably  around  1667  and  probably at Fairfield.   She was  born  around 1640  probably  at Watertown, Massachusetts, and was a daughter of Robert Lockwood  and  Susanna  Norman,  who  had  moved  to  Fairfield  from  Watertown  about  1652.  John  Barlow's  will  was  dated  January 28,  1690/1, and  the  inventory of  his estate was  taken on March 6, 1690/1 [Fairfield Probate District Records]

Their children were:
John Barlow born about 1668;  Abigail Barlow, born in 1671; Deborah Barlow, born in 1675;   Sarah  Barlow  born  in  July  1675;  Elizabeth Barlow  born on  May  11, 1677  [Fairfield Vital  Records]  Joseph Barlow,  born on September 1, 1677 [Fairfield Vital Records];   Ruth Barlow,  born in 1680; and Samuel Barlow,  born around 1682.

Note that  the recorded  birthdates of  Joseph and  Elizabeth  are  too  close  and  there  is  apparently some error.   Jacobus  seems to have  recognized  this  error and  placed  Joseph's birth between that of his sisters Abigail and Deborah, but without explanation.

Ruth  Barlow  was  born  probably  around 1640  and probably  in Massachusetts. She  married Francis  Bradley  around  1660-61 at  Fairfield.  He was born  in 1625 in Eng- land  and  was  an apprentice  to  Governor  Theophilus  Eaton  at New  Haven  before  coming to Fairfield in 1659.  He died in October 1688 at Fairfield.

Their children were:
Ruth  Bradley, born  in 1662;  John  Bradley,  born  in 1664;  Abigail Bradley, born in 1667;  Francis Bradley,  born in 1670;  Daniel Bradley, born in 1673;  Joseph Bradley, born  in 1676; and Mary Bradley, born on December 5, 1677.

Comments,  arguments, criticism  and  facts (especially  facts)  are invited and will  be published in future issues.

NEXT PAGE


 
Newsletter Index

Index Page

Home